Smartphone Awards Est. 2014 · Archive 2025 Awards

How We Test Phones

Our review methodology, scoring system, and how we anchor to MKBHD's Smartphone Awards.

Testing duration

Every phone we publish a full review on has been used as a primary device for at least two weeks. For flagship phones we typically test for four weeks before publishing — long enough to evaluate sustained performance, battery life under varied use, and any first-firmware quirks. For follow-up reviews after firmware updates, we test for an additional one week to verify changes.

Scoring system

Our editorial scores anchor to MKBHD's award outcomes, then refine for everyday usability:

Score Anchor
5.0 / 5 Won MKBHD's Phone of the Year
4.5 / 5 Won an MKBHD category award (Best Camera, Best Battery, etc.)
4.0 / 5 Runner-up at MKBHD's awards
3.5 / 5 Honorable mention or strong contender at MKBHD's awards
3.0 / 5 or below No award recognition; scored on merit. We rarely cover phones below this tier.

For phones too new to be covered by MKBHD's awards yet, we score on the same dimensions MKBHD uses (Phone of the Year considerations: build, display, performance, camera, battery, software, value) and align with the award score we'd expect when the phone is eligible.

What we test

  • Display: brightness in indoor and outdoor conditions, color accuracy, refresh rate behavior, scrolling smoothness.
  • Performance: app launch times, sustained gaming (Genshin Impact, Wuthering Waves), thermal behavior under load, AI feature responsiveness.
  • Camera: same scenes shot side-by-side with award-winning peers (Best Camera winners and runners-up). We test stills and video at default settings; we don't grade against unrealistic Pro settings most users never enable.
  • Battery: real-world screen-on time across mixed use (mail, social, video, navigation, light gaming). We don't synthetic-benchmark battery.
  • Software: time spent on first-day quirks, update cadence over the testing period, and AI feature breadth.
  • Build and design: in-pocket feel, one-handed use, durability under normal handling.
  • Value: price relative to peer phones, including discounted last-gen flagships.

What we don't do

  • We don't run synthetic benchmarks as our primary signal. Geekbench scores don't capture sustained-load behavior or thermal throttling, which matter much more for daily use.
  • We don't review pre-production units. We wait for retail firmware before publishing a review.
  • We don't accept review units in exchange for positive coverage. Manufacturers occasionally provide review units; this doesn't influence scoring. We disclose loaner units in the relevant review.
  • We don't fabricate scores or awards. Every "Awarded Best X" badge links to the actual MKBHD award.

When we update reviews

Reviews are updated when:

  • A major firmware update changes the phone's capabilities (e.g., Galaxy AI rolling back to older Samsung phones)
  • A new generation launches and changes the value proposition (e.g., iPhone 16 Pro after iPhone 17 Pro launch)
  • Long-term durability issues become apparent (battery degradation patterns, hinge failures on foldables)

Updated reviews show a clear "Updated" date on the page.